Iran: activists say 16-year-old girl hospitalized by police over hijab rules
The Guardian-Oct 3rd2023
by: Patrick Wintour
The hospitalisation of a 16-year-old girl in Tehran has led to accusations by a rights group and activists that she was beaten into a coma by Iran’s feared “morality police”, putting the country back on edge a year after mass protests erupted over the treatment of women.
Footage of the incident showed a girl being carried off a train by other girls at a metro station and placed on the platform, where she stays still, apparently unconscious.
According to Hengaw, an exiled human rights organisation, Armita Garawand suffered a “severe physical assault” by the “morality police” for not complying with national rules on the hijab.
State-run media, which published the edited footage, claimed the girl had instead fainted due to a drop in blood pressure, leading her to hit the side of the train carriage.
The published footage does not show what happened inside the train, only the girl walking on and then being carried out, apparently by her friends. The low quality video does not show clearly what type of head covering, if any, that she was wearing.
The government’s official news agency, Fars, published an interview with the girl’s parents, in which they say she was not attacked. The father is recorded as saying: “We have checked all the videos and it has been proven for us that this incident was an accident.
“We request people to pray for our child’s recovery,” he added.
Iranian authorities have published forced interviews with family members in the past, leading to accusations online that the parents were coerced into speaking.
A journalist from the reformist newspaper Shargh who had been trying to cover the story by going to the hospital was briefly arrested. Access to the hosptial has since been restricted by police.
The incident, and the conflicting explanations, have drawn close parallels to the events that preceded the death of a Kurdish woman, Mahsa Amini, who had been arrested for not complying with hijab rules.
Authorities insisted Amini suffered a neurological disorder that led her to collapse inside a police station. Her family never accepted the explanation for her subsequent death in a coma, and said they had been denied the right to choose the doctor to conduct a postmortem.
Since then, Iranian authorities have been trying to re-enforce the compulsory hijab for women including passing new legislation, but in parts of some cities the requirement to wear the hijab is ignored. Security officers often patrol at train stations in Tehran.
Since Amini’s death the level of state censorship has risen and two of the journalists that reported on Amini’s fate remain in jail, accused of colluding with outside powers. Some reformist newspapers have been closed.
On social media it has been claimed that history is repeating itself and that Iranian officials are now involved in a fabricated story, similar to the alleged cover up after Amini’s death. At minimum, the episode underlines the distrust of government officials and state-affiliated media.
The lawyer for Amini, , is in court facing charges for propaganda against the regime, including for challenging the official forensic accounts of her death, and for speaking to local and foreign media about Iran.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I was hoping you would consider taking the step of supporting the Guardian’s journalism.
From Elon Musk to Rupert Murdoch, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest – not profit motives.
And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media – the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. While fairness guides everything we do, we know there is a right and a wrong position in the fight against racism and for reproductive justice. When we report on issues like the climate crisis, we’re not afraid to name who is responsible. And as a global news organization, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective on US politics – one so often missing from the insular American media bubble.
Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone – whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
Read more on original: