Kenare/AFP/Getty Images)
No, Biden’s new deal with Iran won’t involve ‘U.S. taxpayer dollars’
By Glenn Kessler April 1st 2022
— Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), interview on Fox News, March 19
The Biden administration appears to be nearing an agreement to restore the nuclear deal with Iran that was abandoned by the Trump administration. Given the controversy surrounding the deal negotiated by the Obama administration, Republicans are sharpening their criticism of the emerging pact. Banks, in a March 9 tweet, even asserted Biden would give nearly $100 billion in “taxpayer dollars” to Iran.
But this claim — that U.S. taxpayers will end up footing the bill — is really off base. Perhaps these lawmakers are confused after listening to President Donald Trump frequently make similar misleading claims about the Obama-era agreement, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Trump had two favorite lines about President Barack Obama and the Iran deal, both of which he said more than 130 times during his presidency. First, he would claim that Obama gave Iran $150 billion as part of the deal, often suggesting that these were taxpayer dollars. Then, he would add with astonishment, $1.8 billion was in cash.
But as we wrote a gazillion times, the first was completely wrong and the second was misplaced. Iran had billions of dollars that were frozen in foreign banks around the globe because of international sanctions over its nuclear program. So none of this was U.S. taxpayer funds; this was Iran’s money. The amount, according to the U.S. Treasury Department, was about $55 billion, though Iran’s Central Bank said it was even lower.
As for the $1.7 billion in cash — Trump always used the wrong figure — that was related to the settlement in 2016 of a decades-old claim between the two countries, not the nuclear deal. The initial payment was handed over the day after Iran released four American detainees, including The Washington Post’s Jason Rezaian. Officially, it was a coincidence, but many suspected the cash was in effect a ransom payment.
Thus, we were puzzled when we saw Republican lawmakers assert that U.S. taxpayer funds were going to be spent on behalf of Iran in any new deal. Since that had not been a feature of the old deal, we wondered if they had been misled by years of Trump’s rhetoric.
Read more on the original:


Hegseth defends Iran war record after Republican launches impeachment attempt
Trump says he sees no reason to escalate war with Iran, touts his long-term goals in the conflict
Iran says it has lifted its self-imposed limit on missile ranges, and other Mideast news
Some Democrats don’t want to wait for January to block Trump’s war in Iran
Political Losses Deepen the Stakes as Trump Contemplates Renewed Iran Attack
Trump’s VP says the Iran war cost them the midterms